When examining Microsoft Dynamics, one will notice that it generally does not suffer with these same kinds of limitations. It will, however, have a unique pair of drawbacks that could be choking your growth.
For those of you that may not know, Microsoft (MS) Dynamics is similar to Microsoft Office in that MS Dynamics is a suite of business application products. In Microsoft Office, there’s Word, Excel, Outlook, Powerpoint, Outlook. Each of these programs have a definite purpose and they interact pretty much together – but it’s not quite exactly the same picture with MS Dynamics as you will soon see.
Essentially, Microsoft Dynamics is a marketing term for a number of business applications that include one CRM and and four (that we will focus on) ERP systems. Only 1, the CRM, was created from the bottom up by Microsoft and is web based.
You can find primarily four main Microsoft ERP packages that are offered in the United States: GP (previously Great Plains Software), NAV (previously Navision), AX (previously Axapta), and SL (previously Solomon). These four business packages were purchased by Microsoft to make sure they own a foothold in the business software space. Every one of these systems really are a Windows package (problematic within an increasingly Apple oriented world). Each system is targeted to serve different clients but there’s a quite heavy overlap in features and capacities.
Each of these ERP packages have an extended and solid history. But there are a few limitations in comparison with Cloud apps such as for instance NetSuite. First and foremost, you’ve to buy equipment, server software, and labor to setup, maintain and manage the system. Cloud GP This requires business expenditure – and this is where you could see your growth inhibited. All the amount of money spent managing these processes, may be much better used to grow your business.
Another weakness with these independent packages is that they all have their own reporting capacities. Integrated reporting makes for easier business planning. In Microsoft Dynamics, you will need to write your personal reports to combine the data stored within the independent ERP and CRM systems. And Microsoft offers another product to access your data, the Management Reporter. Overall, you won’t get the very best business intelligence because the data is stored in multiple locations. That is one of many strengths of fully integrated business management software, such as for instance NetSuite.
Microsoft is rolling out a unique Cloud offering. It is named Azure, which is really a solution to host these business apps to operate in the Cloud. This will eliminate the need for hardware and server software. But there are still challenges, such as the need to ascertain and create an Azure environment and ensure it functions properly. That means you still better have an IT geek nearby to greatly help out. Naturally, there are third parties that are available for hosting and set up. But many of these processes have costs associated together which can be avoided with the best architecture and offer; essentially, this approach means you are outsourcing a part of one’s IT; although not nearly enough of it. For some businesses, there’s little competitive value in managing all that software in the cloud.
Your costs will undoubtedly be higher since the architecture of Dynamics isn’t multi-tenent. It absolutely was meant to be a unique unique instance. A big drawback is that you will need to manually perform your personal upgrades – and if you do not, you’ll receive behind and possibly risk the necessity to do a new implementation; like investing in new software. The main benefit of software systems, such as for instance NetSuite, is that the application is upgraded twice a year, is included in the contract, and you can’t get behind.