Americans just cannot get enough of football on television.
According to a December 26, 2014 article in USA Today entitled “Bowl Game Attendance on Decline But TV Interest Grows,” author Brent Schrotenboer states, “Although ticket demand is relatively low for lesser bowls, an incredible number of viewers keep watching, even if oahu is the Camellia Bowl in Montgomery, Ala., a game that drew just 20,256 fans a week ago but attracted an average television audience of 1,114,000, in accordance with ESPN.”
Schrotenboer continues to say, “Only 1 bowl game last year drew fewer than 1.2 million viewers typically, in accordance with Nielsen. That’s better compared to the 1.1 million who watched a beginning day baseball game last year between the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox. Nationally broadcast regular season baseball games in 2012 and 2013 averaged about 680,000 viewers.”
Is it possible to imagine then a following scenario for the college football bowl season:
ESPN builds a unique television studio strictly for the objective of hosting college bowl games. The tv screen network already owns and operates 11 bowl games. In like that, it doesn’t have middleman to cope with for these additional events, eliminating having to negotiate with a different facility to host the game. No costs for having to operate a vehicle production trailers or fly technical crews halfway throughout the country.
Since this facility could be built as a television studio and not as an outdoor multipurpose arena, ESPN might make attending the bowl game a real multimedia experience for the fan, with special effects like lasers. lights and smoke. The network could ensure the bowl experience for the live attendee in addition to the tv screen viewer to be unlike any other.
But here’s the catch: the ESPN studio might have just a limited amount of seats, say 5,000 or less, which would minimize construction costs. The studio would not have to be much larger than the average college football program’s practice facility. Just big enough to exhibit to the million plus viewers there are actually some fans in the stands ดูบอลสด.Thus, there wouldn’t be a single bad seat in the house. You’d be assured an up-close and personal bowl experience. And due to the intimate atmosphere, the sounds from the fans would reverberate throughout the facility.
Due to the limited way to obtain seats, this would force ticket demand (and prices) up. No more 60,000- or 80,000-seat facilities which can be less than a quarter full. It would be a 180-degree differ from the current experience, in which many schools need certainly to depend on daily deal sites to help unload their share of allocated tickets.
Thus, the universities would benefit since they wouldn’t be forced to choose the a large number of tickets which they cannot sell (even on Groupon).
ESPN could utilize this facility multiple times during the expanse of the two- to three-week bowl period.
As an example, this year five additional college football teams qualified for a pan that they certainly were not invited to. That’s two additional games that the schools and network are not generating an incredible number of dollars from, forcing television viewers to instead watch sitcom reruns when they would much rather be enjoying a live sporting event. And advertisers prefer to be buying time on a television program that a lot of viewers will watch live and can’t fast-forward through their commercials.
Schrotenboer states, “Schools, coaches and players also are interested – going to a pan game means more possible donations, more television exposure, more practice time and more bonus money.”